Tuesday, September 22, 2009

HUM 223: A view of culture from Alaska

In class Tuesday, we were talking about how culture and art depend on each other, and I mentioned a Russian Orthodox priest who had worked with Alaska Natives for most of his career and had some interesting things to say about culture. Rather than try to quote him from memory, I promised to find what he said and link it to the blog so we can discuss it Thursday.

He's the Very Rev. Archpriest Michael J. Oleksa. He has worked for many years with Alaska Natives, and his website has a nice common-sense definition of culture:
What's a culture? What's your culture? Do you have a culture?
Everyone does. The best definition of culture is "the way you see the world." But you can't SEE the way you see the world. Your own culture is always invisible to you. We can look at other people's cultures and not how they differ from our own, but we can't articulate our own very well.
There's more in a lecture called "Listen to the Other Guy's Story" ... it is taken from his keynote address to the Alaska 20/20 Conference: On the Future of Alaska sponsored by the Alaska Humanities Forum and the First Alaskans Foundation. An edited version appears on the LitSite Alaska website.

Oleksa begins with a definition ... oh, I'll just let him speak for himself:
What’s your culture? It’s a hard thing to define, isn’t it? Look it up in the dictionary -- Webster is of absolutely no help. They’ll start with bacteria for one thing … But when we ask, “What is your culture?” how do you define that? How do you conceptualize it? Talking about your own culture is one of the most difficult things to do, because your culture is the air you breathe. It’s the aquarium into which you were born, and it’s very hard to imagine what life would have been like if you had been born in a lake or in the ocean. Your aquarium is your world. That’s one way of thinking of culture, but that’s limiting.

I’d like to think of culture as the way you understand the game of life. All games have certain rules and regulations that govern them, basic skills that have to be learned in order to win. If you were born into the culture that organizes conferences like this, you were born into a culture that takes time very seriously. It measures time. You have proverbs like “time is money,” and “don’t waste time.” You talk about time as if it were a quantity or a location. Time is something you can be on or ahead of or behind, and that’s why you have to kill a lot of time before it gets you.

If you were born in rural Alaska, however, you don’t necessarily have that sense of time at all. It’s a different ball game, and that’s the first point I want to make. If your culture is the game of life as you play it, because it’s the only aquarium you’ve ever been in, we often assume that our ball game is the only ball game there is -- that everyone plays life the same way, according to the same rules, with the same presuppositions and with the same goals. Then, when you go to another culture, you’re suddenly up against another ball game and you realize not everybody’s playing on the same field with the same equipment, using the same skills to score the same points.
See what's going on here? Alaska Natives, to generalize way too much, are not as bound by time constraints as most Americans. They're not as likely to keep watching the clock and split their time into five- and 10-minute segments as the rest of us are. That means they operate at a disadvantage when they get to a big city like Anchorage (250,000 population) where buses run on time, appointments are scheduled exactly and people live by the clock. It's like playing a different ball game.

But Oleksa also says cities like Anchorage have an advantage because they're culturally diverse. You get Eskimos, Athabascan Indians, Aleuts, recent immigrants from at least a dozen Asian nations, Russians, Europeans and Americans of all different ethnic backgrounds. He continues with his culture-as-ball-game metaphor, and then he says culture is also like a story. Let's follow him:
There are more than a hundred cultures in Anchorage. This means we have the opportunity here to learn a whole lot of other ball games. We can all be like Michael Jordan who is competent in his own culture, as he was in basketball, but who took the risk of going off to the White Sox to play baseball for a change. I’d like to interview him about that experience. He was very competent, one of the best ever in his own ball game, but he left it behind to attempt to learn somebody else’s game and did not succeed with nearly the same glory. I’d like to ask him how much more he appreciates baseball players and the game of baseball now that he tried and didn’t become a superstar.

You see, that’s the problem. With our own culture, we can be competent. We grew up with it. We absorbed its rules without even noticing. We understand time and space and nature our way, the way our friends and neighbors do, the way our own native culture did. But here in Alaska, we have the tremendous opportunity to discover new ways of seeing the world, of understanding reality, of comprehending what it means to be a human being -- and not just by learning one more game, but potentially dozens.

We may never be good at the other guy’s game. We should admit that. We’ll always be more competent, I think, at our own. But we can enjoy and delight in the fact that ours isn’t the only game in town. That’s one definition of culture – the game of life as you play it.

There’s another definition that someone pointed out to me a few years ago. It comes from a book, actually. Similar to my idea of culture as game, it’s culture as story. What’s your story? Not your own story, but the story that started in your culture before you were born. Who were your grandparents? How were they educated? Did they have any formal schooling? Where were they born? In what kind of a community? In what part of the world? And your parents -- how did they meet? Where did they come from? What were their collective expectations for you?

This is how culture is transformed into community. A community in the modern world is a collection of cultures harmoniously interconnecting and interrelating. We have to build community deliberately in the modern world. Community used to be there as a given -- your village community, the village of Koliganek that I just left, the village of Old Harbor where I first entered Alaska.

The village is pretty much a homogenous community, already intercultural, because the village has absorbed the newcomers of the last century or two, and indigenized them. It made them members of that community, part of that community’s history, part of its story, members of its church, parents to its children, Godparents to its other kids -- connected harmoniously.

This is harder to do when you have a city of a quarter million and over a hundred cultures. To build community will take commitment and effort. We have to be committed to it. We have to want it. We have to work toward it. ...
So culture and community are connected, and basically culture is the whole system of beliefs and attitudes and customs, art, music and everything else that surrounds us and makes us who we are. Like any other metaphors, Oleksa's are inexact. They don't fit precisely. But they're worth thinking about. How does culture shape us? How does it shape our art? How can our art help us transcend culture?

And what does any of this stuff about culture and community have to do with what jazz sax player Charlie Parker said in the quote at the top of our syllabus? The one that says: "Music is your own experience, your own thoughts, your wisdom. If you don't live it, it won't come out of your horn. They teach you there's a boundary line to music. But, man, there's no boundary line to art."

12 comments:

Violet Rose said...

father alaska's saying what i've said. you can't have one without the other. culture is what influences art. culture is how you experience the world art is giving form to those experiences so that others can see what you've experienced and how it influenced the piece.

lhscheerleader2 said...

Jazz in general is music which is art and is highly connected with our culture. Our culture depends on our community and our environment. I dont see how culture and community couldn't be connected in some way. Our culture is what makes us who we are, so ofcourse it effects our art.

Unknown said...

I think that Oleska's view on culture is exactly spot on. It does come from different aspects of a persons life as well as thier surroundings. And to go into someone else's culture and try to understand is completely difficult because as Oleska said you did not grow up in it. You have to grow up and be committed to it as he says before you can embrace and understand it. I liked his defintion alot because it reminds me alot of my own

2Kings said...

I think Aleska was accurate in his defintion of culture. It is everything that is around starting at birth. It is what molds you into your own. You reflect your culture and who you are everyday. This transforms into art. It could be the way you dress, talk, etc. Art is your everyday life that is a result of culture.

Rachel Lauer said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

One gets some of their thought process from both their family and peers. Wisdom comes from those around us and the experiences that we've gone through and from others who share their "battle stories". It's from the connection with those around us that we choose to be different but are still the same as the rest of the community. Art is what gives us our differentiality, from each other and from everyone else in the world.

hosby said...

I think that Aleska is saying that each of us create our own culterals that we share and connect with others and pass our cultere along. That if that culture insided of us was wihtin us we could not share our culture with others and thus it makes the sharing of our cultere to others limitless As with Charlie Parker's statement that if is is not within you it cannot come out,

htorricelli said...

Charlie parkers quote and Oleksa comments on culture go hand and in hand. They both discuss the fact that culture influces the art in many ways. Oleksa says that culture shapes up and that we don't notice our own culture. Charlie Parkers quote relates to how we live our culture through our music. Culture is there in everything we do, art included. Without culture our art would not be the same.

Chyndian said...

I think that culture is what have been taught, and what what we learn it makes us unique as people. We all have different walks of life, traditions, and also celebrations. But still I agree that race can't be defined, you can identify with a group but still you can't be defined as one thing because we are all different.
This also can be indentified with art each is different,unique,and it also influences peoples experiences.

Sara Howard said...

I think Oleska’s view on culture is very right. He implies that we are what makes up a culture and our surroundings. Carlie Parkers quote is saying they’re no limits to art. Also that your thoughts, experiences, and wisdom is what you make it. For example art, if you put your wisdom thoughts and experience in something you make art.

steve said...

Culture is everything that surrounds you. We grow up learning the culture, how to speak and act. The culture is reflected through songs, painting, or another one of the hundreds of forms of art.

cen90 said...

i agree with Oleska's view on culture. its everything that surrounds us from the start of life. our culture eventually turns into art with what we do everyday. for example-clothing,dance,sports, almost anything can be art.In conclusion, art is in all of us everyday and its our way of life