... I trace the interactions of black and white music since the time of slavery until World War II and the rise of bebop. And rather than concerntrate on one particular area, such as jazz, I demonstrate how certain patterns recur in a variety of fields, such as show business, blues recording, music composing, publishing, and dance. (xi)The pattern we'll be looking for is that progression from folk to popular to art music. At each step, black and white performers and audiences have contributed to - or stepped back from - what jazzman and educator Wynton Marsalis calls "this strange dance that we've been doing with each other since, really, the beginning of our relationship in America" (quoted in Lee, ibid). As we read about it, I want to refresh your a sense of what it sounded like.
We don't have time to do more today than watch a few video clips, but we need to do at least that because I think they'll help you know what to look for as you read Vera Lee. Terms in CAPS and boldface you should know, because you'll want to be slinging them around as you write your papers.
The big thing about jazz is it's IMPROVISED, like folk music is. It started in a "bounded community," the African American community of New Orleans in the late 1800s and early 1900s. It went worldwide, but it always kept that focus on improvisation -- it's not played note-for-note from sheet music, so players can vary they way they play a song and build on each other's interpretations during a performance.
One of the first roots of jazz was brass band music of the Civil War. Hundreds of infantry and cavalry regiments were organized, and most of them had bands. The YouTube clip shows vintage photos with the Federal City Brass Band playing in the background (playing a Confederate anthem derived from an Irish fiddle tune called "The Jaunting Car"). Louisiana raised at least 30 regiments for the Confederate Army, and 11 regiments of African American troops for the union. That meant a lot of surplus musical instruments after the war, and more than a few of them found their way to street bands in New Orleans.
Marches were very popular everywhere. North and south, local bands played them in gazeboes. The tradition lingers to the present, when Springfield's Muni Band performs at gazeboes in the city parks. Here's a very early movie (1889) for the Thomas A. Edison Music Video Co. showing a regimental band. Recognize the tunes? I hear children's songs ... even an old camp meeting hymn called "Sweet Affliction" that I've also been hearing lately on an ice cream truck on the near west side of Springfield. The band numbers have essentially the same musical structure as fiddle tunes, polkas, ragtime and early Dixieland jazz.
Jazz has always been, and continues to be even now, band music. Religion, not surprisingly, was another deep root of jazz.
STREET BANDS combined the two. They grew up in New Orleans' black community in the late 1800s, and they developed a tradition that combined church processions with street dancing, Mardi Gras and what in time came to be called "dixieland" jazz. The band would play a solemn, dignified tune in the first line on the way to the cemetery. Often it was the old spiritual, "Just a Closer Walk with Thee." Afterward, on the SECOND LINE or way back from the graveyard to a celebration of the person's life very similar to a wake, the band would play upbeat numbers like "When the Saints Go Marching In."
We can't go back in time, but we can get a little sense of what the music might have been like in the early days from seeing what the tradition has evolved into in New Orleans, where roots musicians still maintain something like a bounded community. Many of them are professionals, and music is undeniably hyped for the benefit of New Orleans' tourism industry. Here's a link to a history on a funeral directors' website that explains the tradition, acknowledging its commercial vibes but concluding, "A symbol of life, a symbol of death and a symbol of re-birth, the New Orleans jazz funeral salutes a life well lived and the passage of a departed soul into a better world."
But the traditions survive not only in the tourist sections but also in the neighborhoods. We'll watch amateur video of a traditional jazz funeral for New Orleans tuba player Kerwin James, who died in Oct. 2007.
These brief shots in a tribute to Clarence "Gatemouth" Brown show both first- and second-line playing at his funeral. Brown was a gifted bluesman and standout performer at the Chicago Blues Festival who died, some believed of a broken heart, shortly after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in 2005. Another YouTube clip shows a second line from New Orleans' St. Augustine Church in June 2007.
Louis Armstrong was one performer whose career spanned the popularity of jazz. He started out in street bands like those linked above, and evolved into a polished "big band" performer during the 1930s and 1940s. His career lasted into the period of "modern jazz," which was more classical in tone, but he was uniquely himself. And his music remained popular with mass audiences. Here he plays "When the Saints Go Marching In" with what looks like a 1950s television studio band. And here he sings his trademark song "Wonderful World" on BBC-TV in 1968. Backing him are Tyree Glenn on trombone, Joe Murany, clarinet; Marty Napoleon, piano; Buddy Catlett, bass; and Danny Barcelona, drums. The BBC show was one of Armstrong's last public appearances.
Jazz evolved into what some consider a form of ART MUSIC with the advent of players like Charles "Bird" Parker, Miles Davis and John Coltrane. Here the John Coltrane Quartet plays an arrangment of "Alabama" in 1963. McCoy Tyner, Jimmy Garrison and Elvin Jones rounded out the quartet. Their playing is improvised, but very subtle, intricate and formal like art music. It came to be known as "modern jazz," and it still has a strong market niche mostly in college towns and major metro areas. You can even hear it Saturday nights on WUIS-FM in Springfield.
As you listen to Coltrane, ask yourself the infamous three questions we ask in HUM 223: (1) What stands out as you listen? Does it have features of folk, popular or art music? Does it hold your attention? (2) What in your background, taste, experience, etc., influences the way you feel about it? Does it transcend boundaries and appeal to if it's unfamiliar? Or is it just too far removed from the music you like? (3) What, specifically, about the music and the performance do you respond to? Post your answers as comments to this post.
11 comments:
(1) What stands out as you listen? Does it have features of folk, popular or art music? Does it hold your attention? Its slow, on cue...then comes in together...works well together. It isn't so slow that I can't enjoy it, but just slow enough.
(2) What in your background, taste, experience, etc., influences the way you feel about it? Does it transcend boundaries and appeal to if it's unfamiliar? Or is it just too far removed from the music you like? It is "unfamiliar" in most ways, but I still like it. It ames me relax and just say what comes to mind easily.
(3) What, specifically, about the music and the performance do you respond to? I like how the sax is the main part throughout. It is really clean and soothing, I approve!
I liked the way that all of the musician's can play together so smoothly. Although jazz is all about improv these guys make it seem like it's nothing to all be doing their own things but sounding good together. This was a slower piece, not as crazy as Coltrane is known to get but still was easy to listen to and impressive.
What stand out to me is the use of the saxaphone, i love the sound it reminds me of being little and listen to my brother practicing his saxaphone. I also enjoyed the stand up bass, i found this song to sound more like popular music than folk music. It didnt really hold my attention too much, it may have grabbed my attention if there were lyrics and something to follow along with rather than dragging the song out with no lyrics.
art musicis what i hear. i'd wrather listen to songs with lyrics not just instruments. i like the sax though. i had an older brother that played the sax.
I thought Coltrane's performance was rather classy and relaxed, until the end. It progressed into more of sad and stormy performance. It had a soultre type vibe. I felt like I was listening to an old perry mason episode song. It had elements of suspense and mystery. The transitions were amazing. My sister was a huge AMC movie channel viewer, so I watched a lot of movie that featured music that like this growing up.
1)I like the way the music is played it is very relaxing.
I think that it sounds alot like folk music.
2)I don't really like jazz music, because it usually puts me asleep. I think that if it had lyrics to the music it would be much better to listen to.
3)What I like best is the the way he plays the saxophone though. That's what stands out in my mind most.
I enjoy Coltrane. He was a very complex writer and his music was was considered at the time as Be bop but I kinda think of him as a classical jazz performer. Many of the songs are more improvised and on some of his music performances some songs were played with just a little variation. What stands out to me in his music is the balance between rhythems and the variations in tempo's throughtout this piece. Thus enabling the other performers to showcase their talents. Coltrane was and is still considered on of the best jazz performers. He is one of my most favorite jazz artist.
The thing that stands out most as I listen in the sensuality of the saxophone. Even though there are not any lyrics it feels like a love song to me. I feel like it is part popular because it is clearly rehersed and both men are well trained, but it is also art to me. The reason is because to me it is beautiful therefore art and the two men are clearly passionate about what they are doing, I mean, they seem to love it! It holds my attention from beginning to end. I love the slow beginning and then the drummer joins in with some "funk" so to speak. The reason it appeals to be I believe is because I played the saxophone for much of my youth. I think it is beautiful but is it something I would listen to everyday? I don't know. Possibly if given the opportunity. I respond to the passion and sensuality, and it appeals because I am familiar with the saxophone.
The playing was smooth and very easy to listen to.the Sax was played so well, and he was a very talented player.I was definately interested when listening to the song. It's a very catchy tune that came together well when they played.The players did an excellent job playing on que with eachother.
The tone and tempo of the song, is what really stands out to me, while I was listening to the song. The songs tempo and tone was super calm and chill, it was very steady and slow. This song was not upbeat at all. The background to this song was very instumental, which I related to. I enjoyed all the differnt types of instruments played throughout the song. Specifically, this song kindof reminded me of elavator music, I would normally not listen to this everyday.
It is really impressive how well these musicians can play together. They make an improv song sound like they have memorized a piece of music. The saxaphone makes the hairs on my arms stand on end. The performance was very moving to me.
Post a Comment